Unlawfully Withholding a Child

d. Unlawfully Withholding a Child

Note that all parts highlighted in bold is what is illegally omitted from our laws and enabling
secret war crime. Reading the laws by skipping the bolded wording is roughly how our laws
read at the present time.

When a Children’s Aid Society takes a child and the parent is sure that they are caring for the child properly, the parent should not sign anything the Children’s Aid asks them to because it gives a false appearance that the parent agrees with the Children’s Aid’s desire to withhold the child. The Children’s Aid and the judge can likely place a lot of pressure and demand on things be signed when a parent holds their ground that they are a fine parent.

In law, those who in theory have parental rights, would be written into law and those not mentioned would be disregarded. By neglecting to define all types of parents reflected in our true to life communities, there are rights unjustly voided of parents and children to be a member of a family and associate. The law structure coming from Britain are some of the most advanced but yet in the height of advancement, obvious child protection rights against abuse by officials and the right of the child to be heard, are so unco-incidentally primitive. Some definitions that are set out for the public to adhere to are as follows:

166. (3) CFSA IDEM -- In this section and in sections 167, 168, and 169,
"adopted person" means a person who was adopted in Ontario;
"birth grandparent" means any parent of a birth parent.
"birth parent" means an adopted persons biological mother or father, and includes a person whose consent to another persons adoption was required under clause 137(2)(a) or a predecessor of that provision and was given or dispensed with;
"birth sibling" means a child of the same birth parent as an adopted person, and includes the birth parent's adopted child and a person whom the birth parent had demonstrated a settled intention to treat as a child of his or her family;

In these corrections are included all types of family relationships enabling access to justice, which are denied in these present law sections.

What is particular in the description of “parental abandoner”, is the key point “at will”. We show that the courts can make the system humanly impossible for an average parent to maintain access to justice. Also, the Society can maliciously control and falsify grounds and the judge may rubberstamp it without evidence at the same time. This can cause bureaucratic torture and a parent to have no other option but to give up on legal action and the rights to their child.

The parent knows there is an imbalance to benefit of law or enforcement on their behalf, and is why a parent may not be able to succeed in the legal race. It is not a choice by the parent but is enforced by law errors. At this point, regardless that the Society has not proven their accusations, the grounds for withholding the child becomes “parental abandonment” in the parents inability to respond in court. This organized ring can use unfair complications and disadvantage to falsify abandonment against parents and the drooling judges are happier then royal pigs in do-do. They can tell the children that they were abandoned by their parents which is likely to provoke anger in the child towards i. the original parents who are illegally shut out, ii. the purpose and procreative quality of loving family unity, and iii. God. This generated disappointment created within a volume of children concerning original family is a perfect foundation to produce robotic “live Freemason like machines with no off switch”.

166. (3) CFSA IDEM -- In this section and in sections 167, 168, and 169,
i) "adopted person" means a person who was adopted by proper and reasonable processes of law;
ii) "biological donor" means a person void of parental responsibility from whom the genetics arises of a child
iii) "biological grandparent" means any biological parent of a biological parent.
iv) "birth grandparent" means any parent of a birth parent.
v) "biological parent" means a person's biological mother or father.
vi) "adoptive parent" means a person who assumes responsibility of the permanent care and control of a child through lawful, reasonable, processes and in absence of conflicts of interest.

vii) "birth parent" means a person who has shown a settled intent to co-parent at conception and or birth and is included as a person whose consent is required for the child's adoption under clause 137 (2) (a) or a predecessor of that provision and was given or was dispensed with;
viii) "parental abandoner" means a person described in c) through g) who, at independent will, does not maintain mental, physical or financial care and or control of the child or does not acknowledge the relationship to the child/person.
ix) "parental guardian" means a person who by lawful appointment or relationship maintains temporary care and control of the child.
x) "biological sibling" means a child of the same biological parents of another child,
xi) "birth sibling" means a child of the same birth or co-parent, and includes the birth parent's adopted child and any other child whom the birth parent had demonstrated a settled intention to treat as a child of his or her family;

Children’s ‘Aid Society’s are intended by the public to be a community resource for emergencies involving children. If, in a definition of parent the original parents are not listed they also will not be legally considered. In cases where a parent disappears, there may be justifiable reasons. If, as soon as an agency gets a child into their hands, that agency holds all parental rights, it is no longer a resource but a foreign venus fly trap. There are reasons a parent may need a resource that should not be stigmatized for example a single parent may be in a motor vehicle accident or falsely accused of a crime and detained. At no time would these circumstances mean that the parent and child should be barred from associating with or lose legal rights to each other.

A child may be legally made a ward of the province but a court is not at liberty to take a child in need in a native country, such as Canada, and award them to a foreign country such as a crown ward of Britain. This is High Treason and Genocide to hand control of a nations children to another nation.

43. CFSA -- DEFINITION -- (1) In this section, "parent", in the order of original priority includes,
(a) a person who is: (i) a birth, biological or original parent, (ii) holding lawful care and control of the child,
(b) as a last resort an approved agency governed under reasonable native law that has lawfully retained possession and custody of the child;
(5) WHERE CHILD NOT RETURNED TO PARENT WITHIN TWELVE HOURS -- Where a child taken to a place of safety under subsection (3) cannot be returned to the child's parent within twelve hours of being taken to the place of safety, the child shall be dealt with as if the child has been taken to a place of safety under subsection 40 (2), 40 (7) or 78. (1) (2) (3) but with a mandate to return care and control of the child to his/er original parents as soon as possible by determining if the parents absence is outside of their own human control and therefore the child is not apprehended under subsection (2) but a guardianship may be deemed as a temporary community resource drawn upon pending family emergency. There may be a temporary non-prejudicial support need rather then that of protection under subsec. 40 (2), 40 (7) or 78. (1) (2) (3). If no parent or family member is able to take immediate care and control of the child after 30 days of reasonable efforts and of inability to be located, an application can be made to order the child to be made a ward of the native province. No prejudice is bestowed on the parent unless the prejudice lies in the reasons of absence.