a. High Treason
Note that all parts highlighted in bold is what is illegally omitted from our laws and enabling
secret war crime. Reading the laws by skipping the bolded wording is roughly how our laws
read at the present time.
This volume of loopholes all allowing the same direction of High Treason against the people is proof that Canada is under illegal war seizure by secret, foreign, criminal organization in itself. Although the upcoming public investigation is factual supporting evidence to clarify the magnitude of crime in silence against targeted native families.
When the Charter was introduced, it was declared that Canada had a new independence but it appears that this was just to put the people at a false sense of ease and make them unsuspecting. The tyrannical control of the Monarchy clearly tightened and the new rights and freedoms declared were a blatant misrepresentation in illusion. This guise of illusion by Britain respecting independence was also “staged” in India. Instead of independence, there is a decline in integral behavior by those in position of power. Now, corruption of the authorities in that country is rampant.
When Pierre E. Trudeau introduced the Charter and publicly announced that it would improve rights of security and family, the exact opposite was the truth on paper. The Charter was simply an editing of or omitting from the previous Bill of Rights of 1960. In this editing there were only “removals” and no additions at all of rights and freedoms. The promise of independence from British tyrannical controls was in fact a tightening against the rights of the common people by the Monarchy. It is this writers opinion that Trudeau enacted the Charter to enable ongoing war crimes of High Treason of which he himself was committing and intend to prove this by evidence although the volume of omissions, herein, leading to the same result is evidence before the evidence.
Neither Trudeau nor the Queen Elizabeth who signed the Charter had the legal right to do so. The Monarchy did not have legal right of control of Canada but by fraud and being seized under High Treason. The Charter does not even have to be legally challenged to disregard it and for the public to assume their former, more protective rights because it is a fraudulent document. Regardless of what is written in law at any time period, citizens have the right to any and all protections that are reasonable and fair.
When Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Queen Elizabeth sat down to sign the Charter, they had a plan of war crime seizure similar to what happened on the Mayflower while portraying to the public an illusion of “Independence”. Trudeau was a professional illusionist hiding a declaration of secret war. On the Mayflower, off of land, persons who had no legal right to Canada signed amongst themselves giving them a false right. The true leaders were not fairly considered or informed. Those suppressed leaders are still the true legal native leaders of today due to the constant fraud tactics of the Monarchies through agreements and their apparent true intent to infiltrate by illegitimate children in abuse of citizenship and Freemasons in slow secret Treason. Only the direct Monarchy members, sometimes incestuously produced, are granted inheritance so the illegitimate children are left to be satisfied somehow and silenced. Freemasons and the Monarchy generally appear to make their payments with what doesn’t belong to them. They can make payment by granting the illegitimate children the preferred employment positions or allow them to extort from and offend others without payment or punishment in foreign countries, above the laws implemented in the Queens glorification. See Exhibit No. ____, Photo of Trudeau and Queen Elizabeth in a falsely glorified setting signing in agreement to remove rights and seize Canada. . See Exhibit No. ____, agreement signed on the Mayflower.
Natives appear frozen in passive non-reactive defence by “Stockholm syndrome” and some persons may be forced into ingestion of drugs that induce disorder by our public trusted authorities secretly controlled by these Monarchies and phantom illegitimate ascendants. The citizens are so intimidated that they will passively believe anything that even a five year old can see is wrong, like automatic “yes men”.
Bill of Rights of 1960 states: 6. (5) Any act or thing done or authorized or any order or regulation made under the authority of this Act, shall be deemed not be an abrogation, abridgement or infringement of any right or freedom recognized by the “Canadian Bill of Rights”. (Unless the Act or thing done is an abrogation, abridgement or infringement of rights or freedoms)
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982 states: 26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed (by judges) as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. (Including the Bill of Rights and the original leaders native law.) 27. This Charter shall be interpreted (by judges) in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians. (Judges are not at liberty to use the Charter omissions to construe a right to make extortive orders or orders in denial of rights and freedoms.)
Although the Bill of Rights was also introduced by the British and holds horrific loopholes. It is reasonable at this time to rely on it over the Charter that made even further omissions. We need better protection of our children and property while taking action to extrepicate imposter officials that have slipped into our control seats. We need to support our true Native leaders in moving forward with Native and protective law. True Canadians who have not sworn alternative allegiances need to start running for those positions. This is where we will get protection for our children, families and our earth. The true owners are those who care. That which is stolen is not respected or protected and shall be returned according to the intent that Canadians have contracted a policing body.
Don’t be Trudeau’s sitting duck. See for yourself how the Charter is an illusion, a malicious omission of rights, an act of war crime with the intent to rape a country when you compare it to the Canadian Bill of Rights and view the results of the corresponding law ommissions:
THE PRIOR BILL OF RIGHTS 1960
THE CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS 1960 - the Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free institutions; Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law; And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for it's constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada;
CHARTER IN QUESTION
The CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS - Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
PART I - The Canadian Charter of Rights Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrated as justified in a free and democratic society.
PROPOSED CORRECTIONS
PART I - CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS - Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the superceding position of the original family and the right to enjoy a free and democratic society of free institutions and the rule of law by due processes that respect equality and protection of true multicultural native Citizens;
Affirming also that individuals and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect of healthy, nurturing moral and spiritual values and enforcement of protection of those values under the rule of law;
And being desirous of enshrining these principles, shall reflect the respect of Parliament for it's constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada;
THE PRIOR BILL OF RIGHTS 1960
Sec. 1. (a) – BILL OF RIGHTS 1960 - (a) the right of the individual to life, liberty and security of the person and the enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
CHARTER IN QUESTION
Sec. 7. - CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS - Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
PROPOSED CORRECTIONS
Sec. 7. - CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS - Every individual has the right to life, liberty, family and community unity and support without stigmatizations and security of the person and the enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due reasonable process of reasonable law and based on substantiated evidence;
High Treason seems to be one of the most hideous crimes in the criminal code because when Treason is in the process of succeeding, all other crimes can be committed at the same time in complete systematic collapse of protections.
Although it is a crime to commit Treason, there appears to be no real way, outside of efforts of the common people, of making arrests, having fair trials and enforcing justice. Therefore, it is a Canadian duty of each general citizen to look into and ensure that the people are protected properly from all aspects of High Treason as a modern war crime defence.
Native principles are to freely consult with the ideas and knowledge of fellow citizens, responsibly & peacefully, concerning “politics and religion” in protection of present freedoms and for those in the future. Under pressures of Treason, the people would feel intimidated against open discussion and unity within the community on these issues. Our Native country appears completely unprotected legally by enforcement from issues of High Treason by the Monarchy & their contacts and members of these Freemason principles in particular.
High Treasons, at present, reads as follows:
46. ccc. HIGH TREASON / Canadian Citizen / Overt act. (1) - Every one, commits high treason who, in Canada,
a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
b) levies war against Canada, or does any act preparatory thereto; or
c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
(2) - Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force or violence for the purposes of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other then Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety of defence of Canada,
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person, to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian Citizen or a person who owes alliance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
a) commits high treason if, while in or out of
Canada, he does anything mentioned in
b) subsection (1); or
c) commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
(4) Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason. R.S., c. C-34, s. 46; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 2.
It seems that the British Monarchy and their contacts are usurping, without lawful right, the legal considerations of leadership in our country that truly belong to the Aboriginal Native leaders. High Treason is woven into the fabric of our laws, through loopholes, making their usages of and crimes against the people ungoverned.
The following are inserted changes deemed necessary for true native multicultural Citizens to have protections shown in law and backed by enforcement highlighted in bold:
CORRECTION: 46. ccc. HIGH TREASON / Canadian Citizen / Overt act. 46. (1) - Every one, organization, occult, secret or separate society, commits high treason who, in Canada,
a) kills or attempts to kill the Native & or Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants or true citizens, or does them any bodily or emotional harm tending to death or destruction, genealogically manipulates, maims or wounds them, or imprisons or restrains them;
b) Levies war against true Native Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, or does any act preparatory thereto; or
c) assists an enemy at war with true Native Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Native Aboriginal Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, foreign & or criminal organizations, occults, secret or separate societies and the country whose forces they are.
(2) - Every one, organization, occult, secret or separate society, commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force, violence, libel, mischief, black male, threat, intimidation, infiltration, manipulation of heritage beliefs, unlawful imprisonments or removal of rights, freedoms & enforcements that there ought to be, for the purposes of overthrowing the government of Native & Aboriginal leaders of Canada, of a Canadian province, or region;
(b) without lawful right, communicates or makes available to an organization, occult, secret or separate society, in conflict of interest of true Native Canada or an agent of a state other then Canada's true lawful Native Aboriginal leaders, military or scientific information, any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that organization or state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety of defence of true Native Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, but excluding any obligations of Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, to protect or assist foreign or organizations, occults, secret or separate societies, in or out of Canada, in violations against true Native Canada, it's multicultural people or it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders or their ascendants, or any other peaceful body of people.
(c) conspires with any person, organization, occult, secret or separate society, to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person, organization, occult, secret or separate society, to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that by an overt act.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian Citizen or a person who owes alliance to Her Majesty or leaders of another Nation, foreign or criminal organization, occult, secret or separate society, is in "conflict of interest" to hold position of authority over true and Native Canadians, families and their children or in government duty in right of Canada,
a) commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in
b) subsection (1); or
c) commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
(4) Where it is treason to conspire with any person, organization or foreign state against the Native state, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason. Conspiring includes non verbal decisions, actions or inaction by a pattern of connected individuals, in a frequency that proves not possible to be co-incidental and that produces an unnatural foreign takeover of systems of control from the Native leaders of a the targeted state and or causes removal of usual rights and freedoms of the multicultural Native citizens and leaders within their own state. R.S., c. C-34, s. 46; 1974-76, c. 105, s. 2.
_______________________________________________________________________
OTHER LOOPHOLES AIDING HIGH TREASON
In 1950, it is apparent that name changes law was set up for the purposes of British infiltration in particular. If a person was not British born they had to produce a certificate that they have sworn allegiance to Britain. Subjects who were criminal could join British forces to escape their crimes. If an organization such as Freemasons, trained them into a secret army with a treasonous goal and kept track and thumbs on them through registrations, they could succeed at High Treason section 46. 2. (a) (d). it is this writers opinion that these laws were designed for continued secret attacks against true multicultural natives and primarily the native Aboriginal’s of Ontario. The method’s of attack or weapons being used appear to be property extortion, child abduction, brainwashing, pedophilia, false criminalization / imprisonment, manipulation of reproduction systems, forced ingestion of noxious substances under the guise of prescriptions, and possibly even murder and or for body parts to supply Freemason surgeons and causing pockets of disasters and posing as custodial care. They don’t apologize for the destruction to the lives of persons they infiltrate. Before anyone should be allowed to appear or deliver messages on a TV station inside the homes of the world, or in publications, they should be required to make public the name they were born with before any changes, and date of the changes and what the changes are. If this cannot be clear, there is no business or right to infiltrate a home. It does present high risk to the influence of our children in phantom anonymity.
2. CHANGE NAME ACT AMENDMENTS; Administered by the Attorney General’s Dept. Feb.1961 R.S.O. 1950, Chap. 47;
Section 2. – (3) Any British subject of the full age of 21 years who effected a change of name in Ontario under any right which existed at law prior to the 26th day of June 1939, may make an application under this Act to change his name from the name he bore prior to the change to the name he bears as a result of the change. As though the change had not been effected.
Section 3. – (1) Any person who is a British subject and who is at least eighteen years of age, except a married woman, may make an application.
(2) Where the applicant is an infant, he shall be deemed to be of full age for all purposes of this Act.
13. Section 13 – (3) A judge may by order dispense with the necessity of publishing notice of the application as required by subsection 1 if in his opinion,
(a) the applicant would be unduly prejudiced or embarrassed by such publications;
(b) the change of name applied for is of a minor character; or
(c) the applicant has been commonly known under the name applied for.
Section 14 Clause (e) if the applicant is not a British subject by birth, a notarial copy of the certificate establishing that he is a British subject.
Section 22 – (3) Any person who, after having been convicted of an offence against this Act, again offends against this Act shall be liable to a penalty not more then double the maximum penalty provided for the offence.
It seems that crimes today are committed in advanced secret strategy by using multiple conspirators on many levels of power and including any nationalities as a team. Our authorities are teaching this to the public by example to those who are closest and witnessing who then follow the example to the rest of the public. Focus is on erosion of principles through illusion and not a race issue. Occult like, secret, separate and or criminal organizations can jointly and severally infiltrate the rights of the average citizens, ungoverned by class separations and primitive law omissions. They can target the child more so, to mould the child’s mind away from their family and into their own preferred uses and ways of thinking to benefit themselves. Crime is rampant within our system and true multicultural Native and Aboriginal Canadians will suffer without corrections being made to reflect the true circumstances faced in our societies. There is a horrific volume of victimizing loopholes set out as a Venus fly trap. What is stolen, shall be returned is a true Canadian principle and that includes our property and our children.
Sec. 17. ccc. COMPULSION BY THREATS – A person who commits an offence under compulsion by threats of immediate or eventual death, torture, confinements, abuses, loss, of mental or bodily harm or removal or omission of protections, mobility and freedoms that there ought to be from a person who is or is not present when the offence is committed is excused for committing the offence if there is no reasonable opportunity of reporting to resolve and disarm the threat if the person believes that the threats will be carried out and if the party is or is not a party to a conspiracy, criminal organization or association whereby the person is subject to compulsion, but this section does not apply to be pardoned or excused where the offence that is committed is committed during the commission of or is high treason or treason, murder, piracy, attempted murder, sexual assault, sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm, aggravated sexual assault, forcibly abduction, hostage taking, robbery, assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm, aggravated assault, unlawfully causing bodily harm, arson or an offence under sections 280 to 283 (Abduction and detention of young persons), or any other offences or violations against the nation, the multicultural natives and inhabitants or families and their children. R.S., c. C-34, s. 17; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 29; 1980-81-82-83, c. 125, s. 4; R.S.C. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 40(2).
25. CCC. PROTECTIONS OF PERSONS ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY – 25. (1) Everyone who is required or authorized by true Native Canadian law, who has not sworn or is not acting under allegiance, affiliation or to benefit any alternative separate, foreign or secret entity or organization, to do anything in the administration or enforcement of the law
(a) as a private person,
(b) as a peace officer or public officer,
(c) in aid of a peace officer or public officer, or
(d) by virtue of his office,
is, if he acts on reasonable, legal and justifiable grounds, justified in doing what he is required or authorized to do and in using as much force as necessary for that legal purpose.
(2) Where a person is required or authorized by true Native Canadian law, who has not sworn or is not acting under allegiance, affiliation or to benefit any alternative separate, foreign or secret entity or organization, to execute a legal process or to carry out a sentence upon conviction, that person or any person who assists him, who has not sworn or is not acting under allegiance, affiliation or to benefit any alternative separate, foreign or secret entity or organization, is, if, they, or that person acts in good faith, justified in executing the process or in carrying out the sentence notwithstanding that the process or sentence is defective. (omission) An order of trial or sentence should not be issued or imposed without jurisdiction or in excess of jurisdiction, as jurisdiction issues shall be addressed and deliberated at the outset of a lawful process. See omission: (or that it was).
(3) Subject to subsection (4) and (5), a person is not justified for the purposes of subsection (1) in using force that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily or mental harm, unjustified monetary loss or deprivation or freedoms to associate unless the person believes on reasonable grounds that it is lawfully necessary for the self-preservation of the person or the preservation of anyone under that person’s protection or of any person from death or grievous bodily or mental harm, unjustified monetary loss or deprivation or freedoms to associate.
(4) A peace officer, and every person lawfully assisting a peace officer, is justified in using a minimum of force necessary that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to a unlawfully aggressing dangerous person to be arrested, if
(a) the peace office is proceeding lawfully, and in reasonable balance in consideration of potential risk of harm, to arrest, with or without warrant, the person to be arrested;
(b) the offence for which the person is to be arrested is one that reasonably implicates potential risk and one for which that person may be arrested without warrant;
(c) the person to be arrested takes flight to avoid arrest;
(d) the peace officer or other person using the force believes on reasonable grounds that the force is necessary for the purpose of protecting the peace officer from offence, the person lawfully assisting the peace officer or any other person from imminent offence or future death or grievous bodily harm; and
(e) the offence for which the person is to be arrested is one that reasonably implicates potential risk and or in reasonable balance of force verses potential risk, the flight cannot be prevented by reasonable means in a less violent manner.
*NOTE: Laws implemented do not omit the safety of an officer in the future as I have just formerly underlined but at the same time do omit the safety of the public from future or eventual death or harm as shown in sections ____, ____ & ____.
Our innate right to defend against very serious offences that can destroy families, entire societies and the world in a long-term plan are not written into law and therefore any actions taken in protection on the part of a person of a community are criminalized under the criminal code and used for intimidation to anyone else in the community who may try to erect a defence on behalf of themselves and their neighbors in unity. Defence and unity are innate rights regardless of written law omissions and intimidations.
34. ccc. SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST UNPROVOKED ASSAULT; 34. (1) Everyone or community who is or will be unlawfully assaulted defrauded, tortured, extorted from, abducted, victims of High Treason, criminal organizations, murder or any other offence, if the policing authorities of the state are unwilling or unable to respond, without having provoked the assault, removal of rights or freedoms or confinement is justified in repelling force or confinement by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm that is not ordered as a fair punishment and is no more then is necessary to enable him to defend himself, his family and or community, while evidence is being aired and deliberated by the community members openly and retroactively, to the action taken, wherever possible.
(2) Everyone or community who is or will be unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if
(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of immediate or eventual death or grievous bodily or emotional harm from the offences or violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes, while evidence is being aired and deliberated by the community members openly and retroactively, to the action taken, wherever possible; and
(b) he and the community believes, on reasonable grounds, that they cannot otherwise preserve them self, their family and or community from death or grievous bodily harm. R.S., c. C-34, s. 34.
35. ccc. SELF-DEFENCE IN CASE OF AGRESSSION 35. Every one, government or criminal organization who has without justification assaulted another but did not commence the assault with intent to cause death (or) grievous bodily or mental harm, or removal of rights and freedoms that there ought to be, or has without justification provoked an assault on himself or itself by another, may justify the use of force subsequent to the assault if he had made every effort of opportunity to air and relieve the damage and aftermath and face justifiable punishment of negligence by the unintended results for the most reasonable resolution and (a) he uses the force
(i) under reasonably apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence of the person whom he has assaulted or provoked, and
(ii) in the belief, on reasonable grounds, that is necessary in order to preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm;
(b) he did not, at any time before the necessity of preventing himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose, endeavor to cause immediate or eventual death, or of grievous bodily or mental harm; and
(b) he declined further conflict, by intent, action, principle and association, and quitted or retreated from it as far as it was feasible to do so before the necessity of preserving himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose or became known. R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 35.
36. ccc. PROVOCATION 36. Provocation includes, for the purposes of section 34 and 35, provocation by blows, reasonably unjustified removal of rights and freedoms that their ought to be, words, gestures or serious and real risk or threat by intensions, action, principles and or results of criminal organization. R.S., c. C-34, s. 36.
37. ccc. PREVENTING ASSAULT 37. (1) everyone or community is justified in using force or confinement and community free operating trials of evidence to defend himself, a member of a community or anyone under his protection from assault, fraud, torture, extortion, abduction, High Treason, criminal organization, murder or any other offence, if the policing authorities of the state are unwilling or unable to respond, if he uses no more force or confinement then necessary to prevent the assault or any other crime or the repetition of it, while evidence is being aired and deliberated by the community members openly and retroactively to the action taken wherever possible.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to justify the willful infliction of any hurt or mischief that is excessive, having regard to the nature and immediate and or long-term results of the assault or other crime that the force or confinement used was intended to prevent. R.S., c. C-34, s. 37.
37. CLRA -- APPLICATION TO PREVENT UNLAWFUL REMOVAL AND GRANT THE RETURN OF CHILD -- (1) Where a court, upon application, is satisfied upon reasonable and probable grounds that a person, organization or agency prohibited by court order or separation agreement from or without lawful grounds will remove or is removing a child from Ontario proposes to remove the child from Ontario, the court in order to prevent the removal of the child from Ontario may make an order under subsection (3).
(2) APPLICATION TO ENSURE THE RETURN OF THE CHILD -- Where a court, upon application, is satisfied upon reasonable and probable grounds that a person, organization or agency, with or without entitlement to access to a child proposes to remove the child from Ontario and is not likely to return the child to Ontario, the court in order to secure the prompt, safe return of the child to their lawful residence in Ontario may make an order or Writ of Apprehension to return the child under subsection (3) and Part III of the Child Protection Act.
43. CLRA -- SUPERSEDING ORDER, SERIOUS HARM -- (1) Upon application, a court by order may supercede an extra-provincial or any other order in respect of custody of or access to a child if the court is satisfied that the child would, on the balance of probability based on evidence "shown", suffer serious harm if,
(a) the child remains in the custody of the person legally entitled to custody of the child;
(b) the child is returned to the custody of the person entitled to custody of the child;
(c) the child is removed from Ontario;
(d) the child remains in the care of an agency or organization;
(e) the child is put through an adoption process; or
(f) the person in possession of the child has not obtained lawful care and control.
(2) Upon application, a court by order shall supercede an extra-provincial or any other order in respect of custody of or access to a child if the court is satisfied that the child was unlawfully removed or withheld from the persons having the right to those associations. This abduction and confinement of a child shall be deemed as crime for purposes of crime regardless if the intended offensive purpose is identified and therefore on the balance of reason and probability, will suffer serious harm or loss of rights and freedoms. For the purposes of subsection (2) all cases of unlawful possession are violations of mental harm, cruelty and unjust bereavements of the heart, soul, bonds and character in respect to the rights of the child and the child's lawful family.
(2) ISSUES TO BE DETERMINED -- As soon as practicable, - in - determining whether a child is in need of protection, the court shall determine,
(a) the child's name and age;
(b) the religious faith, if any, in which the child is being raised;
(c) whether the child is an Indian or a native person and, if so, the child's band or native community;
(d) where the child was brought to a place of safety before the hearing, the location of the place from which the child was removed;
(e) who is the co-parent of the child and ensuring acknowledgement and legal service;
(f) material grounds of all affected parties for believing or disproving that the child is in need of protection; and
(g) the circumstances, views and preferences of the child from the child by affidavit;.
The Lieutenant Governor represents the Monarchy of Britain and their Freemason cult who are phantom with no home land have no legitimate authority over the raising of our families in Canada. In fact, the Lieutenant Governors office appears to be a money sucking, fraudulent pedo / necrophile friendly expense of war crime against Native multicultural tax payers. This office needs to be closed down. True Natives and multicultural landed immigrants intended for Canada should specifically refuse to pay for this segment of income taxes.
It is the Monarchy who is attacking our Native leaders and our children and we should not be forced to finance war crimes against ourselves. How can the British “bar” true multicultural natives from forming their own children’s aid society outside of British Monarchy control? The British Monarchy are not legally at liberty to make any decisions regarding our children much less abducting them and raping them with police consent. The Monarchy are mentally messed up in incest and crime and are the worse example of family. Why are they not being arrested for incest? Their brain chemicals are psychopathic. They need desparately to be policed under the law.
The Queens representatives should be “hotly rejected and ejected” from our Native multicultural land, as hard core criminals, extortionists, rapists and murderers that they are. Having a Monarchy control or even influence Canada is against the Charter and Constitution of all being equal regardless of circumstances or status. There is no such thing as Royalty. They are imposters and a criminal gang. Multicultural Natives need to become active in support of the true Aboriginal Native leaders who base their morals on the “truth”, unity of the communities and protection of the environment. Short of this, freedoms will diminish under ill British Monarchy and secret Freemason tyrannical controls. We need to get rid of the Monarchy’s representatives off of our payroll, the pedophile hag Lieutenant Governors office is only one of many.
Child Welfare Act, 1954, Chap. 8; in force Mar. 28, 1956 except as noted Amended 1957, c.12; in force April 3, 1957 except as noted Amended 1958, c. 11; in force Mr. 27, 1958 except as noted, Administered by the Dept. of Public Welfare.
Section 2, Subsec. (2)(a) repealed and the following instituted by 1957, c. 12, s. 1: (a) advise, inspect and supervise children’s aid societies. Subsec. (2)(c) repealed by 1956, c. 8, s. 1.
Section 6, Subsec. (1) amended by 1956, c. 8, s. 2 to read as follows: (1) A children’s aid society may be established having among its objects the protection of child from neglect, the care and control of neglected children, assistance to unmarried parents, the placement of children in adoption, the supervision of children placed in adoption until an order of adoption is made and generally the discharge of the functions of a children’s aid society under this Act, but no society may act as such until it has been incorporated under The Corporations Act, 1953 or a predecessor thereof and until it has been approved by the Lieutenant-Governor in Council.
46. CLRA – 2005 (3) CENTRAL AUTHORITY - The Lieutenant Governor in Council shall be the Central Authority for Ontario for the purpose of the convention. CORRECTION: - The original Native chiefs holding true lawful right of leadership, shall jointly be the Central Authority for Ontario for the purpose of the Convention.
When offences are committed on a boat on the water it is questionable who would be responsible for prosecution of the crimes. It could be too easy to bypass reporting at all. The agreements signed on the Mayflower and other waterways for purposes of High Treason were not prosecuted and the captain or master of the ship is not alive to maintain order on the ship in past tense. It is questionable if a captain would be a reasonable replacement a justice system, in a failure to report to correct authorities. If proper policing is not implemented, vessels may be used intentionally to commit crime, including sexual assaults, and a captain or master may choose to be so soft on a particular crime in kinship or to protect the reputation of the vessel in leaving matters unreported. The Mayflower was a boat that High Treason was planned aboard against North America by the British Monarchy and their Freemasons. They run rampant crimes in Canada by “protection of no arrests” concerning crime committed on a vessel.
44. ccc. MASTER OF SHIP MAINTAINING DISCIPLINE: The master or officer in command of a vessel on a voyage is:
i. justified in using as much force as he believes, on reasonable grounds, is necessary for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline on the vessel,
ii. not at liberty to fail to report a crime to authorities,
and is responsible to
iii. cordon off the crime scene to prevent contamination,
iv. preserve witness statements or other evidence in an uncontaminated condition,
v. report the crime at the time of the offence to the main land with jurisdiction being nearest to the vessel, that would hold responsibility, for investigation and prosecution. R.S., c. C-34, s. 44.
49. ccc. ACTS INTENDED TO ALARM THE ORIGINAL NATIVE LEADERS OR BREAK PUBLIC PEACE 49. ccc. every one who willfully, in the presence of the original native leaders,
(a) does an act with intent to alarm the original native leaders or to break the peace, or
(b) does an act that is intended or is likely to cause bodily harm to the original native leaders,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
64 ccc. RIOT: A riot is an unlawful assembly that has begun to disturb the peace of the multicultural natives citizens or original native leaders, tumultuously.
When the policing authorities make policies and protocols to be followed in conjunction with other public services and those policies are not respecting the Criminal Code and Constitution, the authorities can choose to turn a blind eye on crimes of separate societies in which they are members of, or favor. The authority figures can make agreements secretly between themselves that are not in the best interest of the native people and country.
Many authority figures are brought in through the immigration system, and are required to commit High Treason by swearing allegiance to the Queen of Britain while entering Canada. Without the additions marked in bold to these laws, our authorities do not have to respect the very protections they are entrusted to uphold. This is fraud of the purposes of our taxes and a serious breach of public trust concerning enforcement expected.
122. ccc, BREACH OF TRUST BY PUBLIC OFFICER sec. 122. ccc, Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, or enables such by inaction or agreement in conflicting allegiances, is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offense if it were committed in relation to a private person.
The youth bureaus have been contracted by the public to bring civilized enforcement of protection to our children within their families. This ensures that parents do not have to take justice into their own hands. In circumstances where the Monarchy and Freemasons would like to abduct a child through Children’s Aid’s, loopholes are in place to allow the police and every government body to fail to respond leaving the family forced victims of secret war crimes.
When a Society abducts a child, for that family, it is a “Life Against Life” circumstance, at that moment and into the future as those phantom operating authorities are not properly policed and can do what ever they want to the child. Although the parents and community do have a “legal right” to respond with whatever force necessary, in justified war defence to stop the abduction, any action they take would be falsely dealt with by intimidation tactics under the criminal code by charging the parents under civil rule rather then implementing the appropriate war crimes laws. The family is forced to be victims of war crimes without innate options of defence.
214. ccc. In this Part "abandon" or "expose" includes (a) a willful omission to take charge of or protect a child by a person or police officer who is under the legal duty or public contract to do so, and
(b) dealing, or not dealing with a child in a manner that is likely to leave that child exposed to risk without protection;
264.1 ccc. UTTERING THREAT 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat
(a) to cause death or bodily, mental or financial harm to any person;
(b) a hostile declaration to cause unjust loss, separation, pain, control or punishment, to burn, destroy, induce or aid extortion or damage of real or personal property or financial means;
(c) to cause unjust oppression, molestation, compulsion, vexation, torment, affliction, distress, misery, mischief, obstruct justice, unjust detention, libel, violations of right of mobility or settlement or freedoms to associate or any other offences or rights removals;
(d) to declare a denunciation to befall a person, their family, their bonds or security between a child and his or her original parents and siblings; or
(e) to kill, poison, taunt, annoy or injure an animal or bird that is in the property and possession of or cared for by a person or to make a statement to be interpreted as a threat.
In law set out concerning torture, protection is provided for instigators and purposes except for High Treason and war crimes by phantom Monarchies and freemasons and individuals and organizations under its control or direction. It appears that there are many issues of importance in suffering with torture violations. Physical pain is recognized in theory written in law. Mental torture, which is more like a style of modern secret war of the aforementioned and is not yet properly covered by protection written into law. It may have come to be an emergency to do so, now!
Although our laws are supposed to be respecting the supremacy of God and therefore issues of loses of the “heart”, of original parents and children, our family court judges seem hardened cold to the importance of quality life which has nothing to do with status. For some the very purpose of life is removed by anti-social court orders, under the guise of reasonable resolution, which can effectively leave a person dead empty while still alive. The results caused in anguishing torture may then be “used” to falsely appear as through the anti-social court orders were correct in the first place. It seems to be a Freemason strategy to switch the order of events of cause and effect to mislead the general public.
In issues of extortion, still yet uncovered, by writing into law, is the right not to be stripped of reasonable benefit of efforts for securities or real or personal property by “financial court order mischief” or bureaucratic torture. A person who has successfully planned and worked towards reasonable securities to sustain bare comforts should not be unjustly reduced to homeless or sheltered living. When a person is unjustly suppressed, charged and or detained, it can lead to the loss of an apartment or real estate property and holding personal belongings. When the person is released they may work again to rebuild personal securities. Staged charges through targeting again can reduce the person to nothing. The more unjust charges, the more a person unjustly appears guilty. In time the person does not try to get up because they know it would be wasted efforts due to lack of protections. Efforts of one’s enslaved security can be converted to only benefit tyrannical controllers by malicious systematic manipulations.
269. ccc. UNLAWFULLY CAUSING BODILY HARM AND OR TORTURE OF THE HEART OR MIND: Every one or official who willfully, unlawfully, ought to know, or for unfair malice, advantage or to produce disadvantage, intends, instigates, causes or enables
i.) deliberate or negligent unwarranted and abnormal stresses of the mind that a person/s ought not to or would be incapable of having to endure, or
ii.) causes bodily harm to any person, reducing the quality of life and or purpose; is guilty of (a) an indictable offence ….
--- Why would Polish & British infiltrate ?: Jan. 10, 2008: Poland in comparison: A Parliamentary Republic whereas Canada appears a Parliamentary Democracy with strong federalism to those who’ve sworn alternative allegiances with illegitimates while appearing as citizens. True multicultural Canadians may see the Canadian system as a dictatorship of targeted machine like secret war crime attacks, the weapons being the public services as a widespread secret allegiance, without right of defence by the targeted. Poland is smaller then Ontario but has over 6 million more residents.
Canadian Gross National Product per capita is average at $34,273 comparing to Poland at $14,880. Poland is the 8th biggest country in Europe, neighbor to Germany, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belarus, Luthuania and Kaliningrad of Russia. Poland has 38,7 million whereas 1,67 million are in the capital of Warsaw; President, Lech Kaczynski (Katz – C/Katzman – Ratz?) is the head of state; Parliament has 460 members and 100 senators; Election are every 4 years and entered the European Union in 2004. The head of Opole province is Marshall Bogdan Tomaszek.
Canada has an estimated 32,88 million residents and divides power between the federal and provincial governments. There are 308 members of Parliament and 105 members of the Senate. Ontario has the largest population with 12,16 million residents. Head of the Province is Dalton McGuinty. There are 445 municipalities in Ontario.
Medical: In Poland 43% of what an employee earns is sent to Zaklad Ubezpieczen Spolecznych (Lynch?) Social Insurance Institution, 8.5 % is sent to National headquarter of Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia, NFZ- National Health Fund. The biggest cities with the biggest hospitals in poland are Nysa, Prudnik, Brzeg, Kedziersyn-Kozle, Namyslow, Kluczbork, Olesno, Strzelce Opolskie, Glubczyce, Krapkowice. Regardless of the per capita, the Polish still have to pay for most medical expenses from their own pocket.
Canada has been working on a “new infiltrating strategy” of a “family-health-team” model where doctors & nurses set up communication lines with specialists so that during diagnosis have a better understanding of the history of the patient & predict treatments.
There is a pitfall where system officials become criminally organized in concealing crimes by their own, they control everything in conflict of interest & the citizens cannot get independent diagnosis’ outside of “the power of the loop”. Diagnosis’ & forced ingestion of drugs can then be used to silence witnesses against officials. The lines of communication become contacts of criminal conspiring. Other medical services are being cut back.
By stalking a family over long term, a negative history can by created by officials without the citizen being informed or the right to defend. Dr. Hsu was ordered to pay back $108,000 to OHIP, D. McGuinty halted the audits, Health Minister George Smitherman promised to revise the issues. Since then nothing has been done about overpay outs. New innovative medical techniques are being implemented to smooth out the operation. S. Wierdak, believes the Ontario Health Plan should be used as an example around the world.
--- (Note: student relation: is father funding a dangerous program and sending son as his army to carry it out? Is father instructing son as a secret infiltrator at every step?) Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Prof. P. Dutil, Student is Szymon Wierdak (Ward – Wardak?) student no. 031510878, course PPA 601, Due Oct. 09, 2008. On Oct. 09, 2007 a meeting was held in Nysa, Poland between Dr. J. Miarka and cardiologist Dr. Zembala, doctor of heart desease, “The Projekt”. He privatized hospitals in Czestochowa, Sosnowiec and Zakopane (Siwek Siwiec?). Nyra will privatize now but accessed by every citizen and supported by the Polish National Health Fund. This project was supported by the city mayor A. Fujarczuk, Chairman of the provincial Government, Boguslaw Wierdak, who is also going to provide money from the provincial government and European Union, director of the National Health Fund, S. Lukawiecki (Luke?) and co-ordinator, Dr. J. Miarka, project to be completed by end of 2008.
269.1 ccc. TORTURE: (1) Every individual, organization, religion, Monarchy or official, or every person acting in the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of another individual, organization, religion, Monarchy or official, whether in or outside of Canada, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable offence…..
(2) For the purposes of this section,
“official” means
(a) a peace officer,
(b) a public service officer,
(c) a member of the Native Canadian or foreign Forces,
(d) any person who may exercise powers, pursuant to a law in force in a foreign state, that would in Canada, be exercised by a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), or (c),
(e) a justice or judge,
(f) a Monarchy, or
(g) a member of Parliament,
whether the person exercises powers in Canada or outside Canada; “torture” means any act or omission by which severe pain or suffering, whether physically or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for a purpose including
(i.) obtaining from the person or from a third person information or a statement,
(ii.) punishing the person for an act that the person or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed,
iii.) intimidating or coercing the person or a third person,
iv.) concealment of crime: whereas torture is induced by silencing methods in a. removal of freedoms, associations or mobility that there ought to be; b. harsh physical treatment; c. forced or pressured ingestion of prescribed medications under staged mental health accusations; d. imposing induced mental disorder or torment of the heart by words, action and or inaction that ought to be known to cause such trauma, e. threats and circumstances of torment of the heart and mind, removal of freedoms and or violence imposed on a loved one; or f. security, financial or credibility losses or suppressions caused in slander, mischief or any other crimes and through unjust judgments imposed of population class divisions or targeted stalking and
v.) any other opportunist offences against humanity committed whether or not circumstances of High Treason, war crime or legitimate war exist,
or
(b) for any reason based on the commission of crime or discrimination of any kind, but does not include any act or omission arising only from unintended, inherent or incidental to lawful sections.
(3) It is no defence to a charge under this section that the accused was ordered by a superior or a public authority to perform the act or omission that forms the subject-matter of the charge or that the act or omission is alleged to have been justified by exceptional circumstances, including a state of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency.
(4) In any proceedings, (edited out words) any statement obtained as a result of the commission of an offence under this section is admissible in evidence ….
336. ccc. CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST: Every one, organization, who, may or may not be a trustee or entrusted authority of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another person, or for a public service or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud or defeat and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not intended or authorized by the trust of the true citizens who consist of it's multicultural people, it's Native's & Native Aboriginal leaders and their ascendants, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not less then fourteen years. R.S., c. C - 34, s. 296.
In a moment where the Freemasons could feel that they have placed their members in position to take final open seizure of control, the internet companies can illegally shut off communications of true multicultural citizens and only allow communication of the Freemasons. Yet, Freemasons are not true legal citizens of the native country by conflict of interest of allegiances. Freemasons may feel that any information that exposes the appearances of phantom war intent, breaks their demand of silence or prepares knowledgeable defence for the victims could be misconstrued as “offencive to their plans of total infiltration, control and pockets of selected genocides moving forward”. Freemasons appear as though they feel that they are unquestionable as Gods and the rest of us are like disposable cattle. Hotmail has concealed this writers incoming mail from
annie.aviado@hotmail.com and the writer is not privy to it’s contents. Who would want to interfere with or stop protective law changes?
346. ccc. INTERFERRING WITH, CONCEALING OR STOPPING MAIL WITH INTENT: Every one or organization who interfers with or stops a mail conveyance or blocks a mail send or receive address or box with intent to interfere, conceal, rob or search it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
422. ccc. CRIMINAL BREACH OF CONTRACT (1) Everyone who willfully breaks a contract, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the probable consequences of doing so, whether alone or in combination with others, will be
(a) to endanger human life,
(b) to cause serious bodily injury,
(c) to expose valuable property, real or personal, to destruction or serious injury,
(d) to deprive the inhabitants of a city or place, or part thereof, wholly or to a great extent, of their supply of light, power gas or water, or…..
is guilty of
(e) indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or
(f) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) No person willfully breaks a contract within the meaning of subsection (1) by reason only that
(a) being the employee of an employer, he stops work as a result of the failure of his employer and himself to agree on any matter relating to his employment, or, ….
if, before the stoppage of work occurs, all steps provided by law with respect to the settlement of industrial disputes are taken and any provisions for the final settlement of differences, without stoppage of work, contained in or by law deemed to be contained in a collective agreement is complied with and effect given thereto.
(3) No proceedings shall be instituted under this section without the consent of the Attorney General. R.S., c. C-34, s. 380.
CORRECTIONS: 422. ccc. CRIMINAL BREACH OF CONTRACT (1) Everyone who willfully breaks a contract, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the probable consequences of doing so, whether alone or in combination with others, will be
(a) to endanger life or cause death,
(b) to cause mental or bodily injury, aggravating hardship or damage to a family’s security,
(c) to expose valuable property, real or personal, to theft, fraud, absconding, destruction or injury,
(d) to deprive the inhabitants of a city or place, or part thereof, wholly or to a great extent, of their supply of light, power gas, water or family and community supports and unity,…
is guilty of
(f) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding life, or
(g) an offence punishable on summary conviction if the circumstances of intent of level of harm would justify leniency.
(2) No persons excluding counsels, police officers or services of necessity, willfully breaks a contract within the meaning of subsection (1) by reason only that
(a) being the employee of an employer, he stops work as a result of the failure of his employer and himself to agree on any matter relating to his employment, or, ….
if, before the stoppage of work occurs, all steps provided by law with respect to the fairest settlement of disputes are taken and any provisions for the final settlement of differences, without stoppage of work, contained in or by law deemed to be contained in a collective agreement, that respects civil and criminal law, is complied with and effect given thereto.
(3) No proceedings shall be instituted under this section without the consent of the Attorney General in matters of offences by the general public. Proceedings shall be commenced by members of the general public, physically or mentally affected and without consent, in matters of breaches by public officers.
We really need to build towards respect within society and that starts with respect towards one another in good will. It appears to be freemason acceptable to have one main partner or spouse and have many additional secondary spouses, some known and unknown to each other. The party playing all sides is looking for a person to fit all that can be convenient or of gain to them as Mary J. Aviado admittedly views others. Once that convenience or gain provided by that person is no longer available or ongoing, this type of multiple relationship con will maneuver a total expunging of their victim subject rather then allow reasonable Freedom. This cannot leave a happy peaceful society in which to raise children. It’s not a fad or faze to be a psychopath, it’s disgusting and cruel.
422.1. ccc. CRIMINAL BREACH OF MARRIAGE, UNION OR INTIMATE PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT (1) Everyone who willfully breaks a marriage, union or intimate contract or agreement by breaching promised fidelity, or to enter into or use a relationship meant to be sacred for a fraudulent intent, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the probable consequences of doing so will be
(a) to endanger life or cause death by imposed illness or hostile retaliations,
(b) to cause mental or bodily injury, instability, aggravating hardship or damage to a marriage, union, intimate partnership, security of children or trust and integrity of other members of a community,
(c) to expose valuable property of the family members, real or personal, to theft, fraud, absconding, destruction or injury,
(d) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding life, or
(e) an offence punishable on summary conviction if the circumstances of intent of level of harm would justify leniency.
469. ccc. COURT OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION accessories / Corrupting Justice / Attempts / Conspiracy 469. ccc. Every court of original criminal jurisdiction or an applied for alternative provisional judicial district ordered to try an indictable offence including:
an offence under any of the following sections:
i. section 46. and 47 (high treason),
ii. section 49 (alarming the original native leaders),
iii. section 51 (intimidating a native Parliament or a legislature),
iv. section 53 (inciting to mutiny against original native leaders),
v. section 61 (seditious offences),
vi. section 74 (piracy),
vii. section 75 (piratical acts), or
viii. section 235 (murder);
the offence of being an accessory after the fact to high treason or treason or murder;
an offence under section 119 (bribery) by the holder of a judicial office;
(c.1) an offence under any of sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act;
the offence of attempting to commit any offence mentioned in subparagraphs (a)(i) to (vii); or
the offence of conspiring to commit any offence mentioned in paragraph (a).
The Queen should be arrested for High Treason, Treason, property extortion, child abuse, torture and fraud against Canada and targeted true multicultural Canadians. She nor Trudeau had the legal authority to implement the Charter over the Bill of Rights 1960. She and Trudeau did imply through their signature that Canadians were independent from British control in that signing & public statement but at the same time both Trudeau and the Queen failed to take steps and procedures to remove the issues of foreign infiltration of control and extortion of Canada from Canadian Law. In omitting to do so, Treason is committed from 1982 to the present day by the Monarchy, joining Monarchy’s, illegitimate ascendants of the Monarchy and affiliate Freemasons criminal organization. Our children are left as targets of rape by these aforementioned offenders to pandemic proportions while our properties are extorted under the guise of law. We are disposed of by criminal court orders. Every Prime Minister since 1982 is guilty of Treason against Canada for omission to take steps to remove the foreign criminal controls. Regardless that Trudeau cannot be charged because he is dead, the Monarchy members and their Illegitimate born Freemasons can be. The Monarchy members do not truly inherit anything that their ancestors extorted but they do inherit the crimes and responsibility for the crimes they continue, represent and participate in.
481.2 ccc. OFFENCE OUTSIDE CANADA 481.2 Subject to this or any other Act of Parliament, where an act or omission is committed outside Canada and the act or omission, when committed in those circumstances, is an offence under this or any other Act of Parliament, proceedings in respect thereof shall, whether or not the accused is in Canada, and regardless of status, be commenced, and an accused shall be charged, summoned to, tried and punished within any territorial division or public unity of agreement in Canada in the same manner as if the offence had been committed in that territorial division. 1996, c. 31, s. 72.
If we contracted our judges to make reasonable resolving decisions in our hearts and in our minds, why would we not want this written into law. We do expect reasonable orders to be based on the evidence provided by all parties involved. This is Treason that even a Grade 2 student can see, yet Canadians….? If a true multicultural Native or lower level freemason thinks that they will be able to avoid, run from or be some how protected is sadly mistaken. These loopholes were not made just for this writer. It is a slow gradual genocide of pockets of people in intervals. Sitting ducks needs to start thinking about protection.
482. ccc. POWER TO MAKE RULES 482. (1) Every superior court of criminal jurisdiction and every court of appeal supreme court may make rules of court or orders based on the evidence provided and not inconsistent with this or any other Act of Parliament, and any rules so made apply to any prosecution, proceeding, action or appeal, considering reasonable allowances for extraordinary circumstances as the case may be, within the jurisdiction of that court, instituted in relation to any matter of a criminal nature or arising from or incidental to any such prosecution, proceeding, action or appeal. (2)…
Most court buildings have signs posted that say your not allowed to record in the buildings. The security guards also try to intimidate against recording. In fact it is a crime of intimidation that the court is pulling on citizens in that they are intimidating people against protecting themselves against the Freemason justices who make extortive and criminal decisions in favor of their own organization members. These signs and security guards are misrepresenting for purposes of war crime infiltration. It is best to record any hearings you are a part of if: i) you believe the judge is malicious in not basing his/er decisions on the evidence, ii) the reporters are illegally omitting information from the transcripts; iii) if other court officials may be committing breaches of trust; iv) or any other inappropriate or illegal behavior that may affect a citizens life. Freemasons are enhancing their right to offend against the public and falsely criminalizing acts of defence and protection by the citizens. If a guard threatens a citizens to not record, the citizen can just tell the guard that it is their legal right to protection of crimes being committed ongoing. The signs they have posted in the court forbidding recording are illegal intimidation by the freemasons members who are employed in our court system.
In these matters in the upcoming case study, I will explain issues where reporter, Pauline Clark, illegally omitted parts of a transcript to hide and protect illegal behavior of Judge Schneider of Old City Hall Court in 2005. The omissions were what I wanted went I paid for the transcript. I was defrauded. Pauline’s actions are serious crime against the public but there is no justice because it is her own superiors who would have advised her on the omissions, otherwise she would not have known what to omit. J. Schneider had stolen documents from the accused on Oct. 05, 2007 and later claimed they do no exist. In these circumstances, J. Schneider imprisoned me for one month illegally. It is my opinion that hard core criminals have seize Old City Hall. Canadians have the legal right to audio record for reasons of protection, Charter section 7. & Bill of Rights, anything that is public and any communications they are a part of in protection of their self or on behalf of a fellow citizen. They do not have to inform anyone that they are recording. It is criminal intimidation that the courts threaten persons concerning this on signs in the court buildings. The courts appear to me to not want recording by the public so they can tamper with evidence. Officials who threaten against recording are committing a criminal offence. A Family Court reporter at 311 Jarvis st. Toronto has also tampered with a transcript in this matter also.
AUDIO RECORDING IN COURT BUILDINGS: Any one may audio record any communications that they are a part of while inside a court or government building, including trials, or if they believe that a crime is being committed within the room against a citizen or through the processes whereas evidence needs to be collected for protection and prosecution.
Joyce’s oldest son David Meyer is head of the World Mission Dec. 06, 2007 CTV, he is promoting Joyce’s Ministry programs to all the people. And to “get them plugged” in to local churches. (Cambodia ?) Joyce said they faced serious resistance by the people to allow them to come in and preach their gospel. I don’t think Joyce got the message to respect their rights, and she pushed herself on the people without choice. She indicates the excitement of the resistance eggs a person on.
Joyce says they have delegates there from every nation to help (infiltrate). The people shut down one of their meetings. Joyce thinks the people view themselves in acts of bravery but it was important that they showed them by pressing onward… they train the leaders and the children workers. ..we’ll now have an ongoing ministry in Cambodia….mobile med. units, orphanages… Joyce is asking us to partner with her by sending donations so she can press forward, if you do you will be blessed, if you send $1000 dollars or more Joyce will send you her promotion package on how to study the bible.
Somewhere someone is going to have to give. …are doing a dental and medical outreach…allow the people to be touched… Scott: . It has taken hundreds of people over the last year to make this happen, it has been a huge success. We need good people running those projects.
